Month: July 2013

Blurred Lines: How Gendered Descriptions of Drinking Hurt Campus Safety
Posted by On Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Imagine a young man and woman, both heavily intoxicated, stumbling around a college party. What would their friends say? Would they perceive the man and the woman in the same way? And if they didn’t, what might be the consequences?

According to a new study, college students are likely to describe the man as heavily intoxicated — wasted, tanked, trashed. But they’ll probably describe the woman as only moderately intoxicated — maybe just tipsy or buzzed.[1] This is true even when the man and woman are equally intoxicated.

The Problems of Misperception

It may not seem like a big deal, but students’ misperceptions about how drunk someone is carry serious consequences.

For example, the study notes that misperceptions could normalize heavy drinking. If a male student boasts that everyone was wasted at a party — even if everyone wasn’t — other men may be encouraged to drink more when they hear how fun the party was.

These misperceptions could also lead college women to underestimate the risks associated with intoxication. For example, a young woman who thinks she’s just “tipsy” may also believe she’s fine to drive home, even when she’s not.

Another potentially more troubling issue, however, surrounds alcohol and consent to sexual activities. Alcohol abuse and sexual violence are intimately connected. Consider these findings:

  • Half of all sexual assaults are committed by men who have been drinking.
  • Half of all sexual assault victims report that they had been drinking when they were assaulted.[2]
  • 72% of college women who were raped were intoxicated at the time of the attack.[3]
  • Each year more than 97,000 students between 18 and 24 suffer alcohol-related sexual assault or rape.[4]

Though research suggests that campus sexual assaults are rarely just drunken misunderstandings,[5] alcohol does play a role in most campus sexual assaults. If a man thinks a severely intoxicated woman is only “tipsy,” he may misjudge her ability to consent. Similarly, friends and bystanders may underestimate the risk of a situation, and let a friend do something (or have something done to her) that puts her at risk.

Researchers also speculate that men may use alcohol to justify sexual coercion.[6] By labeling himself and his friends as “wasted” or “tanked,” a man absolves them of any responsibility for their actions and implicitly condones coercive behaviors that are seen as part of being drunk.

Ways Forward

Although it’s not clear what causes these differences in perceptions, the researchers hypothesize that while women are encouraged to drink as much as men, they must also navigate the negative stereotypes applied to women who drink heavily. “This double standard,” the researchers explain, “may lead women to apply moderate intoxication terms to themselves and to other women to downplay their level of intoxication and not violate perceived social and gender norms” (Levitt et al. 2013, 5).

For men, meanwhile, heavy drinking constitutes an important part of what it means to be a “man” in college. Thus, they want to be seen as heavy drinkers and describe themselves as such.

The study only reinforces the importance of drinking cultures on campuses. It’s not just alcohol, but students’ perceptions about alcohol that are problematic.

In response, student affairs specialist should consider dedicating some of their time to helping students become more aware of how they describe each other’s drinking behaviors and encouraging students to discuss the relationship between drinking and gender stereotypes.

Works Cited

[1] Levitt, A., Schlauch, R.C., Barholow, B.D., Sher, K.J. (2013). Gender Differences in Natural Language Factors of Subjective Intoxication in College Students: An Experimental Vignette Study. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. DOI: 10.1111. . See also the earlier study Levitt, A. Sher, K.J., Bartholow, B.D. (2009). The Language of Intoxication: Preliminary Investigations. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 33, 448-454.

[2] Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P.O., Clinton, A.M., McAuslan, P. Alcohol and Sexual Assault. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. . Abbey, A. (2002) Alcohol-Related Sexual Assault: A Common Problem among College Students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol Supplement, 14. Available on College Drinking. .

[3] Mohler-Kuo, M., Dowdall, G.W., Koss, M.P., Wechlser, H. (2004). Correlates of Rape while Intoxicated in a National Sample of College Women. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65,37-45.

[4] College Drinking. National Institue on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Web. .

[5] See for instance Lisak, D., Miller, P. (2002). Repeat Rape and Multiple Offending among Undetected Rapists. Violence and Victims, 1, 73-84.

[6] Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P., Clinton, A.M., McAuslan, P.. (2004). Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: what do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 271-303.

Talk About It!Share on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

Clery Act: Stricter Enforcement and New Requirements
Posted by On Monday, July 22, 2013

After Jeanne Clery was raped and murdered in her Lehigh University dorm room in 1986, her parents fought to give other families access to information about campus safety, which they hoped would help prevent violence at colleges and universities. Out of their efforts grew the Clery Act, requiring colleges and universities to disclose statistics about crimes that occur on and around their campuses in an Annual Security Report (ASR).

Schools began submitting ASRs in 1992, but enforcement of the act has been lax. According to a 2005 National Institute of Justice report, only 37 percent of schools reported statistics in a manner consistent with federal laws. Yet Senator Arlen Specter claimed in a 2006 Senate hearing that the Department of Education (ED) had imposed only three fines in 20 years.

Now it looks like ED is getting serious about the issue of campus safety and is no longer issuing free passes to noncompliant colleges and universities.

Even as ED ramps up Clery Act enforcement, a series of high-profile complaints filed by students across the country suggest a popular groundswell against noncompliant schools. A group of student activists even hand delivered a petition to ED requesting stricter enforcement of the Clery Act and Title IX.

New Federal Requirements

Indeed, the federal government placed campus safety front and center on March 7, 2013, when they enacted the Campus Sexual Violence Elimination (SaVE) Act. The SaVE Act expanded the crime categories in a school’s ASR to include:

  • hate crimes based on national origin, sexual orientation, and gender identity
  • domestic and dating violence
  • stalking

The SaVE Act also requires schools to create policies and education programs for students and staff that promote awareness and focus on prevention of sexual violence. These education programs are aimed at preventing sexual violence and will bolster the ED’s enforcement effort to bring about lasting change.

Given the tragic consequences of sexual violence, helping students stay safe is a goal we all share and support.

Talk About It!Share on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

Does Your Syllabus Violate Title IX?
Posted by On Wednesday, July 17, 2013

A professor at the City University of New York (CUNY) might have violated Title IX by prohibiting a pregnant student from having more than one medical emergency during the semester.

The National Women’s Law Center  filed a complaint with the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR) on behalf of Stephanie Stewart, an honors student studying on an academic scholarship at Borough of Manhattan Community College in the CUNY system, claiming discrimination and retaliation under Title IX, which prohibits discrimination based on pregnancy.

According to the complaint, Stewart informed her professors that she was pregnant and might miss classes and assignments because of medical emergencies associated with her pregnancy. She wasn’t asking to be excused from assignments, only to be allowed to make up missed work and tests.

Stewart claimed that four of her five professors had no problems accommodating her. One professor, however, allegedly refused to change her policy against make-up tests or assignments.

The complaint alleges that Stewart’s professor explained that she didn’t include a student’s lowest test score when calculating the final grade, so missing one exam due to an emergency wouldn’t be a problem. But, according to an email provided with the NWLC’s complaint, the professor wrote, “What you must try is NOT to have TWO emergencies. Is this clearer now?”

Stewart complained to administration about the policy, writing, “emergencies in their nature are unpredictable, unplanned and unpreventable.”

Stewart says the administration then told her the professor could set policies, and if they didn’t suit Stewart, she should drop the class. Without the school’s support,  Stewart decided to withdraw from the class, which she says cost her her scholarship.

Furthermore, Stewart was planning on graduating that semester; the complaint claims that the dropped course forced her to attend for an additional semester — without her scholarship and while caring for a new baby.

CUNY settled the complaint by agreeing to adopt a new policy to address the rights of students who are pregnant or parents, and to train faculty on the policy. CUNY also reinstated Stewart’s scholarship and reimbursed her for her expenses.

Setting Clear Course Policies

While it’s easy to criticize the professor and the school, the real issue here is that apparently neither clearly understood their legal obligation under Title IX and how it applied to course policies.

Title IX requires schools as well as individual professors to accommodate pregnant students, which means they must be flexible when enforcing any rule or policy and determine the individual student’s needs and how to help them comply with the rule or policy. Indeed, the Department of Education explains that under Title IX:

[A] teacher may not refuse to allow a student to submit work after a deadline that she missed because of absences due to pregnancy or childbirth. Additionally, if a teacher’s grading is based in part on class attendance or participation, the student should be allowed to earn the credits she missed so that she can be reinstated to the status she had before the leave.

Indeed, the NWLC claimed that the school violated Title IX in part by “maintaining a policy that allows individual professors to set rules regarding leave and make-up work, without clear guidelines regarding compliance with civil-rights laws.”

Similarly, Lara Kaufmann, senior counsel at the NWLC, told Slate: “What we notice at the post-secondary level a lot, school administrators want to give professors the discretion to set their own absence policies and make up work policies…And either those professors aren’t aware or don’t care that they have to comply with Title IX and its regulations.”

The point is not to excuse the professor’s conduct but to emphasize that she and other professors must be better informed on their legal obligations when setting or enforcing course policies.

For this reason, all schools should take steps to educate professors of their responsibilities under Title IX. The need for further training is especially pressing in light of the OCR’s recent actions, which suggest greater vigilance and enforcement going forward. Indeed, the Department of Education (ED) just released a “Dear Colleague” letter reminding schools of their obligation to accommodate pregnant and parenting students.

And it’s not just about compliance.  These policies can significantly improve student retention as well.

As Stewart herself eloquently said, accommodating pregnant students can help “thousands of students as determined as I am to set a secure path and bright future for their children and themselves, and we all deserve that chance.”

Talk About It!Share on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

Posted by On Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Welcome to the CampusClarity blog.

At CampusClarity, our expert team helps colleges and universities maintain a healthy campus climate and comply with the law. This blog is our newest effort.

In these posts, we will discuss major compliance developments. We will navigate the laws, regulations, and best practices that inform campus policies. We will cover topics ranging from Title IX and the Campus SaVE Act to child-abuse reporting, professional ethics, and harm-reduction strategies.

Enacted in March 2013, the Campus SaVE Act has expanded higher education crime reporting requirements and education programs for students and employees. Now more than ever, schools must improve campus safety and compliance. In a small way, this blog will help.

We welcome your feedback. Help us improve our comprehensive harm-reduction program and make this blog a valuable compliance resource.

The CampusClarity Team

Talk About It!Share on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrEmail this to someone